New World Order is Now Trendy
World Leaders Find LUV for New World Order
Australia: Populate and We Will PerishChina One Child Policy to Stay
China’s one child policy will remain unaltered during the 12th Five Year Plan period (2011-2015), said a Chinese official, refuting rumors of a relaxation in the family planning measure, NFDaily.cn reported Friday.
The policy has been dogged with controversy recently in the country where the sizzling economy is increasingly laden by an aging population and foreseeable shortage of labor forces.
Read more from China Daily
India embarking on a one child policy
THE government’s decision to formulate a new population policy, emulating China’s single-child families by 2015, to avoid a serious socio-economic debacle due to ever-increasing population is an eminently sensible one. According to the draft policy, couples having only one child will be given preference in all state facilities, including the government’s assistance during admission to educational institutions. Read more
China says one child policy will continue
Despite the fact China is facing population challenges such as fast aging and sex ratio imbalance, the country will continue its low-birth policy, said Li Keqiang, Vice Premier of China.
China is facing the pressure of population growth and the country’s aggressive development over the past three decades has raised new challenges, Li told authorities at the National Population and Family Planning Commission today, reports Xinhua. Read more
China’s one child policy causing school aged children to stress
China’s one child policy means many children grow up with their parents and two sets of grandparents focusing exclusively on them, driving them to succeed in a nation of 1.3bn people where gaining entry to universities, government jobs and graduate careers is highly competitive.
Even among young children, mountains of homework and long hours of extra-curricular activities are not uncommon as China’s new middle classes strive to give their only children an edge over their playground rivals.
“The aspirations of many parents, who had limited educational opportunities themselves are now invested in their only children,” the study said.
Read more from the UK Telegraph
Chinese Man Seeks US Asylum Under the United Nations Convention Against Torture
CHANG HAO LIN-LIN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF U.S.
CHANG HAO LIN-LIN, Petitioner,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent.
No. 08-1180.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) January 5, 2010.
Opinion filed: January 13, 2010.
Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Chang Hao Lin-Lin petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). For the reasons below, we will deny the petition for review.
Lin-Lin, a native of China, entered the United States in December 2004. He was charged as removable as an alien who entered without being admitted or paroled. See Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i)]. He conceded removability and applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
Specifically, he argued that as the spouse of a woman who had been forced to have an IUD inserted and undergo two abortions, he qualified as a refugee under the Act. Following both abortions, Lin-Lin became “angry” and “extremely upset,” and went to the family planning office to protest. The first time, Lin-Lin “quarreled” with the family planning authorities.
As a result, he was detained for two days and “beaten up,” resulting in leg “injur[ies] and bleeding.” Lin-Lin went to his village doctor, who treated him with medicine. After learning of his wife’s second forced abortion, Lin-Lin returned to the family planning office and was again “beat[en] . . . up badly.” He also had to pay fines totaling 8000 RMB. Read more
China Says One Cild Policy Causing Population Problems
A study from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), a government-backed institution, has found that “China’s ‘one couple, one child’ family planning policy” has resulted in a gender imbalance that is the “most serious demographic problem facing” the country, the Times of London reports.
“The report makes no bones about how the one-child policy – introduced to curb population growth and still in place in most circumstances – has led to a Read more
Don’t follow China’s example
Holding China up as an example of how a country can control its population is a poor model.
It is well documented that women who dare to “choose” carrying a second child to term, are ostracized, coerced and have been made to stay in waiting rooms until they decide to go through with terminating their pregnancies. Read more
People Polution? An Agenda to Push Abortions
Pesticides, oil spills, litter – everyone agrees that these pollute the environment. But what about … babies?
Environmental groups have long argued that population growth causes a host of environmental problems, but many of these groups have traditionally avoided the controversial promotion of birth control as a solution. Read more
Sorry, Your Baby Has Got to Go
ObamaCare is about a lot of things other than abortion, it’s true, but whereas, TARP and the ARRA have been used to bolster the banks and auto industry, health care money will underwrite the abortion industry – Planned Parenthood – already awash in state and federal funds, not to mention the blood of millions of unborn human babies.
Will this be enough for the population controllers? Read more
A Global One Child Policy?
China should not be held up as a population control role model for the rest of the world, by Francis or anyone else, but roundly condemned for its widespread and systematic violations of human rights, especially the rights of women. Anything less encourages the Chinese government to continue its brutal repression of the population. Read more