New World Order is Now Trendy
World Leaders Find LUV for New World Order
Australia: Populate and We Will PerishChinese Man Seeks US Asylum Under the United Nations Convention Against Torture
CHANG HAO LIN-LIN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF U.S.
CHANG HAO LIN-LIN, Petitioner,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent.
No. 08-1180.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) January 5, 2010.
Opinion filed: January 13, 2010.
Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Chang Hao Lin-Lin petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). For the reasons below, we will deny the petition for review.
Lin-Lin, a native of China, entered the United States in December 2004. He was charged as removable as an alien who entered without being admitted or paroled. See Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i)]. He conceded removability and applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
Specifically, he argued that as the spouse of a woman who had been forced to have an IUD inserted and undergo two abortions, he qualified as a refugee under the Act. Following both abortions, Lin-Lin became “angry” and “extremely upset,” and went to the family planning office to protest. The first time, Lin-Lin “quarreled” with the family planning authorities.
As a result, he was detained for two days and “beaten up,” resulting in leg “injur[ies] and bleeding.” Lin-Lin went to his village doctor, who treated him with medicine. After learning of his wife’s second forced abortion, Lin-Lin returned to the family planning office and was again “beat[en] . . . up badly.” He also had to pay fines totaling 8000 RMB. Read more
People Polution? An Agenda to Push Abortions
Pesticides, oil spills, litter – everyone agrees that these pollute the environment. But what about … babies?
Environmental groups have long argued that population growth causes a host of environmental problems, but many of these groups have traditionally avoided the controversial promotion of birth control as a solution. Read more
Canadian Newspaper Calls for One Child Policy
One of Canada’s most popular newspapers, the Financial Post, is calling out for a one child policy and it is stirring up controversy everywhere. The editorial by Diane Francis is promoting China’s one child and the drastic as well as deadly, forced abortion policy. China’s population control program enforces it so couples cannot have two or more children. This strict child policy has been enforced with vast human rights and extreme abuses of state power nationwide. Read more