1. Is this situation man-made or not?
2. Is there anything we can do to change things for the better?

As far as the second question is concerned, many people think that the answer is a resounding “yes”.

According to the people such as Anne Petermann, there are three important approaches. On the one hand, unification represents an important first step and aside from that, things must move in two important directions: coming up with real solutions which are socially just, locally controlled as well as bio-regionally appropriate on the one hand and addressing the real root of climate change (overconsumption, forest destruction, fossil fuels and others) on the other.

We do not hear too much about China here in the states and reports on this one child policy. So, I thought I would provide you all with some research links, facts and the cold reality of how China treats humans

In 1994, the UK Telegraph an article reported the truth:

China’s one-child policy spawns secret slaughter: Vast exercise in social engineering proves lethal to millions of girls and puts the population out of balance

MILLIONS of baby girls are believed to have been quietly put to death in China as a result of its rigid ‘one-child’ policy of population control. In male- dominated rural areas, the pressure to have a son is so strong that girls often disappear shortly after birth, giving parents another chance to ensure their only child is a boy.

Now peasant tradition has found a modern reinforcement – pre-natal scanning. In one rural township where parents have been able to discover the sex of their children in the womb, more than three boys are being born for every two girls. The Communist Party committee in Zaozhuang, in the northern province of Shandong, has warned that officials who have used scanning to detect and abort female babies will be stripped of their posts and membership.

Obtaining evidence of this secret slaughter has never been easy, except for the growing disparity in population statistics.

This week, I reported that China was in Copenhagen, Denmark with a mission to push their one child policies on the world:

China defended its family planning policy as a way to reduce global warming. According to Beijing, its one-child and birth control policies, which include forced abortions and sterilisations on unwilling women, are part of its global strategy to fight climate problems and should be adopted by the international community. – Asia News

Population controls can save the environment and the international community should adopt China’s one-child policy with that objective in mind, Chinese government sources said. The head of China’s delegation to the UN Conference on Climate in Danish capital urged US President Barack Obama to cut greenhouse gases. European leaders pulled an all-nighter to reach a deal on helping developing countries fight global warming. The € 6 billion (US$ 9 billion) aid package would be spread over three years.

Keep in mind that China is a communist country and this baby killing advice is coming from a land where pollution kills 750,000 in China every year. Apparently carbon emitting and polluting factories that produce toys and clothes for the world in slave factories are more valued than human lives.

In an article in the UK Telegraph in 2007, they reported:

Pollution kills three quarters of a million people in China every year, according to previously unreleased World Bank statistics.

The figures, almost twice previous estimates, were calculated using a new statistical model. But they have been suppressed until now because the government feared they would cause social unrest, according to reports.

I assume in China it is easier to find a willing doctor to perform abortions then it is to be a mayor of a city. Wanted: Mayor for polluted China city

BEIJING (AFP) – A city in northern China notorious for its pollution and deadly mining accidents is having trouble finding willing candidates for mayor and Communist Party chief, state media reported Wednesday.

The two top posts have been vacant since September in Linfen, regularly cited as one of China’s most polluted cities, when their former occupants were sacked over a mining disaster that killed 270 people, the China Daily said.

So has their one child policy and look the other way at polluting factories worked? Well, if you consider human rights violations, corruption and baby soup just part of the baby killing business then I guess, yes. Later the BBC wrote an article titled: Has China’s one-child policy worked?

But there is a more sinister aspect to this policy, which is sometimes employed to make women less willing than Ms Zhao accept the rules.

Activist Chen Guangcheng was sent to prison last year for exposing what he says were over-zealous health workers in Linyi city, Shandong Province.

He says they illegally forced women to have late-term abortions and be sterilised.

Listening to these clowns is like letting your children listen to Ted Bundy, Charles Manson or Richard Ramirez give them tips on how to kill straight from Death Row. It just does not make moral sense to me.

Yesterday, I reported on the inhumane act of using aborted human fetuses in soup and other Chinese dishes that is currently accepted and legal in China:

Dead babies can be purchased in Taiwan for 70 US dollars for being used as grilled delicacies.- Seoul Times

An Email report received by The Seoul Times confirmed that news with several vivid and appalling pictures of human embryos fetuses being made into a soup for human consumption.

The report went on. A town in the southern province of Canton (Guangdong) is now on trend taking baby herbal soup to increase overall health and stamina and the power of sexual performance in particular.

But apparnatly to others who live in what appear to be civilized societies are recommending that we adopt China’s one child policy.

So who in the West wants to bring the people under China’s forced abortion, one child policy? Well, lets take a look.

According to Diane Francis (a Canadian journalist who is recommending such measures), the world’s population would be reduced from 6.5 billion to 3.43 billion by 2075. She called it an inconvenient truth that we all need to accept and called kids carbon emmiting units:

However, there is one inconvenient truth that she forgot to mention in her baby killing article: Canadian Journalist, Diane Francis has two kids (excuse me readers, carbon emitting units ) herself. It gets worse folks, her sister also has two carbon emitting, polluting little units. AKA Children

Is Diane Francis a lying hypocrite?

She is not the only one who sees population control as a potential solution. Several “alleged” experts see population control as an alternative to technologies which have a lower emission of carbon dioxide as their main focus. They appear to be using China as a scientific role model of what can be done by forced abortions and inprisonimg people for having more than one child.

Britain’s Optimum Population Trust put together a study called,
REDUCING FUTURE CARBON EMISSIONS BY INVESTING IN FAMILY PLANNING which analyzed carbon dioxide emissions as well as population control as two potential solutions to the environmental problems our planet is or will be confronted with. Their study (considered cynical by quite a few people) analyzes things from two perspective: the costs associated with technologies which reduce carbon dioxide emissions on the one hand and population control as a measure of gradually reducing the planet’s population (less people who emit carbon dioxide – less carbon dioxide emissions, this is the part most people find extremely cynical) on the other hand.

The conclusion of their study: “The cost/ benefit analysis found that family planning is considerably cheaper than many low carbon technologies.”

If you visit their website they even have a human population ticker that supposedly measures world population growth and then under this ticker is says:

World population is projected to rise from today’s 6.8 billion to 9.15 billion in 2050.* The World Population Clock is ticking. We are rapidly destabilising our climate and destroying the natural world on which we depend for future life.

In other words, KILLING unborn babies and FORCED abortions are cheaper than cleaning up factories.

The “Case for Killing Junior” has just begun and I am afraid that the ruling class who control every facet of our society are hell bent on leading the West down this hellish path.

Apparently they are our Bad Shepard’s and we are the sheep.

More Research Links on Human Fetus Soup in China for Those In Denial:

• http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-3-29/53482.html
• http://online.wsj.com/article/SB841080751616130500.html?mod=googlewsj
• http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=5825
• http://online.wsj.com/article/SB842478198389915500.html?mod=googlewsj

Although all scientists interpret data in different ways, Chris Horner says that NASA scientists working on climate change have been particularly active in advocating for global warming. What is the motivation for this? And what could be the consequences?

Russia Today You Tube

Global cooling threatens disaster for humanity in the developed and developing world alike, yet the media and the scientific consensus ignores this peril.

The Climategate controversy revolves around whether warming has been real and why it has not persisted – but it misses the point.

Cycles are involved, not short-term trends, and many respected scientists, especially those in Russia and China, think that a cooling cycle is coming.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1234515/Copenhagen-summit-The-world-COOLING-warming-says-scientist-Peter-Taylor.html#ixzz0ZKOq1LQn

LoanSafe’s worst media puppet of the week

MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann claimed that Fox News cooked up the ClimateGate story and that Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson and Brian Kilmeade of Fox are part of a “propaganda fester” working at Fox News.

Apparently this full of himself news anchor seems to think that CNBC is propaganda free and he is not a media controlled puppet just like the people he criticizes. Maybe Mr. Olberman is not aware that massive corporations like General Electric sign his paychecks and banking Goliaths such as like JPMorgan Chase sit on your company’s board. The same people who will fire his a$$ in a New York minute if he doesn’t push “their” agendas. The same corporate henchmen who will profit handsomely from these global warming schemes and from the taxing of every American citizen through cap and trade to further grow their massive empires.

We have already proved on this blog without a shadow of a doubt that ClimateGate is real and now we will expose Olberman’s lies for what they are. Simply put, CNBC and Keith Olberman are conspiring to deceive the people by issuing disinformation and propaganda that is seriously affecting every man, woman and child in this country.

Here are the news stories that CNBC and Olberman may want to read and get educated on. What do say Keith or am I gonna be your next worser person of the day for exposing your hypocrisy?

• CNN – ClimateGate Facts – What is ‘Climategate?’

On Tuesday November 17, a substantial file including over 1,000 emails either sent from or sent to members of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in eastern England, were allegedly hacked and leaked onto the Internet.

The material, dating back to 1996, was published on Web sites run by climate change skeptics who claim efforts had been made to manipulate data to exaggerate the threat of global warming.

As a result of the “leak,” the head of the CRU, Professor Phil Jones, said he would step down from the post while a review is carried out into claims of data tampering.

• Washington Post – The Climate Change Travesty

The travesty is the intellectual arrogance of the authors of climate-change models partially based on the problematic practice of reconstructing long-term prior climate changes. On such models we are supposed to wager trillions of dollars — and substantially diminished freedom.

Some climate scientists compound their delusions of intellectual adequacy with messiah complexes. They seem to suppose themselves a small clerisyentrusted withthe most urgent truth ever discovered. On it, and hence on them, the planet’s fate depends. So some of them consider it virtuous to embroider facts, exaggerate certitudes, suppress inconvenient data, and manipulate the peer-review process to suppress scholarly dissent and, above all, to declare that the debate is over.

• Heritage.org – Sensenbrenner (R-WI) on Climategate Should be in Copenhagen Agenda

ClimateGate will not be a topic in the meeting rooms of Copenhagen. I plan to attend the Conference in Denmark, however, and it will be one of my top agenda items.

Just an FYI to CNBC and Olberman fans: CNBC propaganda works just the same as Fox, but being political and media competitors, they work against one another. Different lies, but a form of propaganda, none the less. Please stop worshiping these media idols and please get educated on how corporate media really works. Trust but verify these millionaires who give us folks on Main Street the news.

Olberman blamed Fox News for Climategate as well as for the fact that Fox News indulges in the profitable business of propaganda, half truths and outright lies much alike its counter part MSNBC that has a strong ideology.

He also blames Stewart for buying into the ClimateGate scam. According to Keith Olbermann, the comedian John Stewart is the main person who is behind the Fox Conspiracy to deny climate change. John Stewart had poked fun at Al Gore and the Climategate scandal. In fact, Keith Olbermann also rightly pointed out that Fox had skewed Stewart’s segment and had made ludicrous claims.

With reference to the above, it is difficult to comment on what Keith Olbermann, Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson and Bryan Kilmeade believe in, as they are just reading the teleprompter scripts that have been handed over to them by their respective employers.

As Paul Watson had pointed out on 6th March this year, Fox News has admitted to pushing the climate change issue in its television shows. Other popular shows that are aired on Fox News like “The Simpsons”, “King of The Hill”, “Family Guy” and some other shows are known to contain politically charged global warming messages. This has subsequently resulted in the observation that Fox News has cooked up the Climategate story propaganda.

I am not choosing Fox over CNBC in this article or saying one is better than the other for Main Street. I believe that both corporate media giants are disseminating disinformation daily to fool the public and push their employers for profit agendas. Just like if you were to ignore your boss at work and did whatever your pleased, you would be fired quickly.

The media and million dollar cable men like Keith Oblermen are no different folks. Beck, Hannity, O’reiley, Olberman etc. get paid millions to fool you into believing it is their agenda. When in reality it is all in the name of the mighty corporations for whom they owe their million dollar paychecks to. Not your silly Main Street a$$.

Meanwhile great men like Lord Mockington, who’s also one of the most outspoken critics of global warming theory is hell bent on exposing the global warming scam.

Today, the United Nations Climate change conference has opened in the Danish capital of Copenhagen.

The note has been issued by the professors Thomas Stocker and Qin Dahe who are the Co-Chairs of the IPCC’s Working Group I. They have claimed that all these findings are the result of many years of scientific research and are not unequivocal.

This note was released after the private emails which were stolen from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK, had questioned the key findings of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report or the AR-4 and the credibility of its auditors.

The official response that was issued by the IPCC WGI also emphasized on the fact that all the key findings that have been presented in the report are based on assessments that are not biased and are transparent. The report also has revealed that these independent findings that are leading to significant changes in the world environment are the effects of greenhouse gases.

They have claimed that all these conclusions have been the result of many years of scientific work and research that have also involved statistical methods coupled with a range of different climate models.

Sources: Ecopolity , IPCC , Earth Stream

Al Gore and his followers seem to be laughing all the way to the bank, it seems that more than a few people have made a lot of money by tricking the average citizen into thinking that man-made Global Warming is more of a threat than it actually is.

While the average Joe is trying to do whatever he can to save the environment, the very people who should be out there protecting it are having fun with their less than environmentally friendly limousines and jets.

Source: Daily Mail

For being bad polluting Americans, you will be “forced” to fork over billions in carbon tax dollars to what now appears to be a fraudulent scheme. A taxation plan on the American people in order to funnel money to foreign countries whether you like it or not.

When we the people have the world’s most powerful people backing potentially the world’s largest scam, the people are simply screwed into submission.

What, you don’t believe me? Come on you silly little complaining tax payer. Is your memory that bad? Do you remember that bank bailout or was that too long ago?

Can I refresh your memory on the trillion dollar bank bailout that 80% of the people were against that still went through? A bailout that your children and their kids will pay for. That bailout seem to go to bonus every scum bag and thief on Wall Street while you get your home foreclosed on and lose your job. A bailout that was called the biggest rip off of the American people in the history of the world.

Yeah, that scam is old news now. Time for bigger, better and bolder taxation methods that will make you slave for the American empire and now, third world countries for years to come.

So, what are the other non-UN experts and scientists saying in regards to global warming?

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) claimed that the worldwide sea-surface temperature (SST) was the hottest since the 1880s. A scientist and expert in climatology, Joe D’Aleo confronts this skewed climate data below widely distributed essay that is circulating the internet.

It appears that the incredibly propagandized corporate media is sweeping this scandal and reports that dispute global warming under the rug by failing to report on the infamous emails that expose the scam in full detail? Emails that prove the collusion to mislead and defraud the public by top UN scientists like Phil Jones, a professor at the University of East Anglia and the head of the Climate Research Unit (the unit which basically “tricked” people into believing in Global Warming) received $13.7 million in grants. Jones, Michael Mann of Penn State and a lot of other academics have been outed as people who have deliberately misled the public.

This is incredibly disturbing to say the least and what some would say is a crime.

Michigan Congreswoman Candice Miller called for a Congressional investigation due to the fact that, in her opinion, the destruction of data some scientists were involved in represents a criminal act.

Many believe that this failure to report the facts further proves that the media giants who control what we see and hear through are TV’s and radio are also in collusion to push the ClimateGate scam on the people. These voices have even forced the New York Times Editor to write an open ed piece about their lack of coverage of the global warming scandal and ClimateGate.

However across the pond in the UK, the media headlines last week read,” Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation.”

All the while, for the most part, our American media is taking the fifth. However, in the Middle East, the headlines read like this, ” How mainstream journalism is failing its audiences.”

With the internet’s rapid growth and an associated flourishing of alternative journalism, the traditional disseminators of information to western audiences – our print and broadcast media – have come under scrutiny as never before. There is a growing sentiment, particularly on the left but also to be found elsewhere, that mainstream journalism is failing us, even if a variety of reasons are proposed for this failure.

When the media fails to report facts, bloggers, activists and concerned American citizens are picking up the reporting slack.

Groups like We Are Change are confronting these mad scientists and even protesting the self anointed poster child for Global Warming, Al Gore at his book signings. Forcing the former vice president to cancel speaking gigs and $1,200 hand shakes in order to avoid opposition in his quest to force cap and trade down the peoples throats.

Meanwhile, scientists like Joe D’Aleo of the First Director Meteorology at The Weather Channel and former Chairman of the Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, American Meteorological Society are making waves on the internet. He also writes for IceCap.US.

Joe D’Aleo has commented on the declaration of the ‘record’ sea surface temperatures by the NOAA. He has stated that NOAA has tried to build a situation about ocean warming by eliminating the satellite inputs in the worldwide ocean calculation. They have also not utilized the NASA’s Argo data. The result was a leap of 0.2 degrees C or over and a new record of ocean warming in July. ARGO stated that this was another instance of the incomprehensive choices of the NOAA, the alteration of facts in order to support political agendas.

Joe D’ Aleo also commented on the worldwide temperature declaration. Through the quoting of 90% of climate stations and the latest elimination of contribution of satellite inputs in the temperature evaluation of ocean, NOAA has made sure that all the months and seasons would grade and legalize their part of excrement as CCSP and support Cap-the-Tax.

The NOAA, NCDC or even the staff members at the local offices are not responsible for manipulating the grades or files that are published. It is the mistake of the higher rank officials and managers who work for the United Nations, who have no other job but to create a climate change hoax.

Is this is a pressure tactic used by the government in order to control basically all the factors of people’s existence?